Making sense of this crazy world

Having looked at the People’s Budget of 1909 in Britain, I’m turning our attention to America and Roosevelt’s New Deal, his response to the catastrophic Great Depression, his attempt, in his own words, to ‘save capitalism’, I’ll add: to save capitalism from itself. Now, if you’ve been following my podcast over the years, we’ve explored the New Deal over some twelve episodes in my series on Industrialisation and Capitalism. I’m not going to repeat all that, the focus here is going to be on how classic liberalism led to the crisis and how Roosevelt’s New Deal applied social liberalism to ease the situation and ensure there would be no repeat.

I grandiosely bill this as British Liberalism’s Greatest Moment but to be fair, it is. Because the "People's Budget" of 1909, introduced by the then, Chancellor of the Exchequer David Lloyd George, changed the taxation system so as to redistribute wealth and fund Britain's first major social welfare programmes, including old-age pensions and unemployment insurance. It made history as the first budget to attempt the meaningful redistribution of wealth by heavily taxing the rich to help the poor. It was a very big deal.

In my look at the political “isms”, I’m going to start with the philosophy that nudged us onto the path to democracy: liberalism.

This week, I’ll present a cautionary tale, that contains a message for us all, not just women: what we have can be taken away. And to do so, I’m going to take a look at what happened to women in Nazi Germany. So, much as I criticise democracy because it should be so much better, let’s work to improve it but let's also value what we’ve got.

Having spent weeks looking at the different roads to democracy in Britain, America and France, 50% of the populations of Britain, America and France – women - still haven't got their vote. And so, it’s to women that I focus our attention on in this episode.

In this episode I’m going to take us from British democracy in the nineteenth century right up to today: to votes for women, votes for eighteen-year-olds and other important landmarks.

So, having looked at the battle to get it passed, was the so-called Great Reform Act worth all the fuss? We'll take a look at that and we'll look at the Second Reform Act of 1867, what Benjamin Disraeli described as a "leap in the dark".

I spent last week looking at how the aristocratic elite were doing all they could to prevent any breech on their monopoly of power. Well, much as they tried to keep the door tightly closed. That bew breed of  'urban aristocracy' that Asa Briggs had talked about were banging against the door and they’re not going to go away.

Enough of the French, I say, and their crazy revolutions. Let’s look at how the English did things in the nineteenth century. “Reform in order to conserve” was the English way: give a little when you have to in order to keep what’s most important. You’ll see what I mean, in this episode, and as the next few episodes unfold.

Through the English, American and French revolutions and those of 1848, we have been looking at the history of what we call liberal representative democracy, by which today, all adult men and women, periodically have the opportunity to vote for people to represent us, make laws and govern over us. And, actually, we began this journey back in ancient Athens, with Athenian or direct democracy. Well, today, we are going to look at the first attempt at a worker’s democracy because we’re going to look at the Paris Commune of 1871.